Home > Uncategorized > What Happened to the Passengers of All ’4′ Flights on 9/11

What Happened to the Passengers of All ’4′ Flights on 9/11

What Happened to the Passengers of All ’4′ Flights on 9/11

Note: I have come upon an ENORMOUS amount of information, evidence, articles & facts relating to the truth behind this cover up. If you click on “more” and scroll to the bottom, you will find links to articles that will keep you busy every night for a week. Please read this information & share it. The link above is the original source of the research collection.  

Most people are not aware that there are issues with the 4 groups of people who flew on the 4 flights of 9/11 from 3 locations. There are so many issues it would take a newsroom full of dedicated reporters a long time to sift through it all. There are problems with the boarding of passengers on 3 flights. And on the 4th flight we find 2 boardings, an unusual event to say the least. Two of the aircraft, we are to believe didn’t even take off on 9/11, as this is what registers in the BTS database for flights 11 & 77 on 911. Two of the aircraft that allegedly struck the towers, can be plausibly shown to be drones, calling into question both passenger and crew from those respective flights. (11 & 175) While flight 77 obviously didn’t crash at the Pentagon from all evidence shown, and flight 77 is one of the 2 flight which BTS shows no departure time for. While flight 93 wasn’t even a regular flight on 9/11, it was created in the last 2 hours before it flew. And as you will see are good reasons to believe Flight 93 was boarded twice at Newark. If this sounds confusing, it is because it was meant to be so. But I believe this article shows it is possible to make some simple sense out of the days events and tie them all together.

This was taken by the Naudet brothers, filming a documentary of 911. Below is a screen-shot of the BTS database, Bureau of Traffic Statistics. Oddly it shows that Flight 11, with no wheels off time, or departure time, showing that it never took off on 9/11. This exact same oddity is duplicated regarding the Flight 77, the other American Airlines flight on 9/11 which allegedly took off from Dulles. The BTS database shows that the 2 American airlines planes, flights 11 & 77, as having no wheels off time or departure times. This is actually a key to understanding 9/11 as well as the mystery of the planes & passengers.One mystery compounds into another creating a chain or sequence of events that become confusion. The largest blunder that 911 investigators have made is to be aware of this BTS discrepancy and then act as though it wasn’t there. Nearly everyone who becomes aware of this BTS discrepancy, then go on to assume that these passengers somehow still ended up on flight 11. The passengers did disappear after all, did they not? And we were all told that they boarded and were on flight 11, right? We have Air Traffic controllers as eye witnesses saying that flight 11 was seen on radar, and followed all the way to the North Tower of the World Trade Center complex. We also then have the cell phone calls from the passengers themselves, to bolster this story, do we not? Thus the path of least resistance to the investigator of 911 is to assume that the BTS discrepancies regarding flight 11 & 77 is just a snafu or a glitch. Or perhaps, facing all of the obstacles above, the 911 investigator thinks it less difficult to shift focus into other areas of investigation, of which, thanks to the planners of 911, there is an abundance. Please see the rest of story below the chart below;

BTS – Bureau of Traffic Statistics showing Flight 11 never departed from Boston Logan international Airport on 9/11/2001.

The problem with nearly all 911 research regarding this issue of the BTS discrepancies of flights 11 & 77 is it all ends here, and no more questions are asked. If you ask the right question, you usually get the right answer. If you ask the wrong question, you usually get the wrong answer. If you ask no more questions at all, you will get no more answers. And thus, it is left there, with no more questions. So lets start asking some of the questions which have never been asked or pursued.Question # 1. Do we have any evidence that shows the passengers at the airport, boarding terminals or boarding the planes?

Answer: No – Not on any of the “4 flights” of 911 [Is this not a huge red flag already? If such footage existed, and by all means if the governments story is true, there is indeed footage of all the passengers at the airports and boarding terminals. Yet not an inch of footage of this video has ever once been produced.] **The answer why there is no video of any of the passengers at any of the terminals or airports is because it simply does not exist and never did exist.

Question # 2.
 How does a passenger purchase a ticket for a Flight which will not fly on 9/11?

This is conceivably possible. Flights are canceled all the time and combined with other flights according to the dictates of the airlines and passenger loads any given day. Yet there are no records of any such occurrences on 9/11. The official story is set in stone. The people boarded Flight 11. They boarded AT Flight 11′s gate.

Question #3. How does a passenger fly on a flight which never takes off on 911?

Now this is impossible. This is where the tougher questions are needed. The passengers all disappeared and that, seamlessly, on 911. This is beyond dispute. And yet they never could have boarded a flight that did not take off. They might have conceivably purchased tickets for these flights, but they could have never actually gotten onto flight 11, boarded and then taken off. Why? Because the BTS database is accurate and also definite. Flight 11 did not depart on 911. Unfortunately this presents a conundrum and a wall of confusion that none stepped over till now.

Question # 4.
 Where did the passengers go, if not onto flight 11?

Were they herded into rooms at the airports as some theorists have assumed? Were they tricked onto boarding another flight, which they thought was flight 11, a sort of ‘patsy plane’ if you will? These are all legitimate questions because we do after all have the collective disappearance of of 92 souls. They had to have gone somewhere, because they couldn’t have gone nowhere. They didn’t board or fly on flight 11. We have no reports of any disturbances at any of the airports, much less Boston Logan, which would likely happen if airport officials tried to sequester 92 people trying to board a flight inside an International airport with hundreds of witnesses all around, and yet they collectively disappeared. Not onto flight 11. And not sequestered at the airports. Then where?

At this point we are running out of ground to walk on unless we pass over the most difficult bridge of all and ask the most unpleasant of all questions;

Question # 5.
 Were any of the passengers on flight 11 or any of the 4 planes part of the conspiracy of 9/11?

As an investigator, all things need to be considered. Regardless of peoples emotions, and all lines need to be investigated. The fact that there were no disruptions at any of the airports, indicates that the passengers disappeared seamlessly. Without struggle. Without commotion. Without notice. And without video surveillance. The fact the government has not produced a single video showing any of the passengers is likely because if they did so, it would prove upon analysis that the passengers were in a part of the airport they never should have been on 9/11. This is why the government cannot produce the video of any of the passengers on 911 at the airports, with the possible exception of Flight 93 which we will touch on later.

The fact that the passengers disappeared seamlessly would indicate that they were willing participants by and large. It is plausible to believe that some passengers were just regular people, and randomly chosen for death & disappearance on 9/11. The planners after all were doing as much for 3000 people at the World trade Center. A few more is nothing to them. But it is not plausible to believe this is the case for all of the passengers.

This item is what I believe is an issue which cannot be answered without more data. Whether or not regular passengers were chosen and incorporated into these flights, or whether or not they were all in one way or another part of the conspiracy. Perhaps it is a mixture of real passengers and conspirators. It is beyond the scope of this article to deal with all of the passengers and possible connections to 911 planning, although there is a mountain of supporting evidence, when there should be none. And for at least 3 of the planes passengers in question, their disappearance at the airports deserve further investigation, for we know that the 3 groups of people from flights 11, 175 and 77 were not passengers on their respective flights. The fact that the passengers from these 3 groups, at 2 airports disappeared so seamlessly is indicative that they were possibly willing participants. Combined with the lack of video the government has released showing any of the passengers at any of the 3 airports, it surely isn’t implausible to believe that they are in a position where they cannot produce the video without incriminating themselves. My belief is that they do have video of the 3 groups of people at the 2 airports (93 is not included here) but cannot release it because it will show the passengers in a part of the airport they were never supposed to have been. Which would of curse help citizen investigators come closer to determining how 911 was operationally pulled off regarding the passengers and 4 planes. Why else would they withhold it?

It should be noted that all of the above, regarding Flight 11 was also repeated at Dulles International Airport. Done twice at 2 airports. The 2 flights which the BTS shows as never having taken off, flight 11 & 77, the two American airlines planes. One from Boston, one from Dulles. The passengers for the other ghost flight, 77, the flight which the BTS shows as never having taken off, by and large mirror what is described above with flight 11. All of the passengers of flight 77 disappeared, seamlessly, yet they didn’t get onto or take off on flight 77, because the BTS shows it as never having taken off on 9/11. And likewise, no reports of commotion or disruptions at Dulles, as one would expect if an entire plane-load of passengers were being redirected against their wills, in a public International airport. I emphasize, that they disappeared seamlessly. Without notice. Without commotion, & as the passengers on the other ghost flight of 911, flight 11 at Boston Logan, without video surveillance.

This constitutes our 2nd conundrum regarding the passengers and the 4 flights on 9/11. 2 groups of people, one from flight 11 at Boston and one from flight 77 at Dulles would both seamlessly disappear under similar circumstances. And both groups of people would never board either of the flights, 11 or 77. Because the BTS database tells us this flight never departed. Let the conundrum remain for now, and don’t ignore it, because in it lies part of the solution to understanding how they operationally pulled off at least one layer of 911.

We encounter our third conundrum with the photographic evidence of flight 175. Even from a casual observance of all the evidence of pictures and video we have of flight 175, it is quite obvious it was not a commercial airliner, much less flight 175 which had passengers on board.

Thus if commercial flight 175 did not hit the South Tower as we were all told, our third conundrum now becomes what happened to those passengers on flight 175? A third group of missing people. If they were not aboard that plane, and all evidence tells us they weren’t, then where did the passengers from flight 175 go to? Were the planes switched in mid-air? Taken over by remote control and flown into the towers? Where o where did this third group of people, the passengers from flight 175 disappear to? Is anyone starting to see a pattern here? One group after another of the 4 groups of people on 911 have all sorts of difficulties with their stories and the story of their disappearance.

As we move along to Flight 93 we will find even more issues. Though not quite the same, and as a matter of fact, we will get a glimpse of the key to understanding this mysteries outlined above. Something nobody was ever intended to read or see. It is simply an unintended consequence of 9/11 and something the planners of 911 couldn’t ever plan for or forsee.

Flight 93 was boarded twice. By two groups of people at two separate locations at Newark Airport. We know this because of two credible eye-witnesses. This is also more then likely the reason why flight 93 was 41 minutes late in taking off on 9/11. We were never supposed to know or learn of this 2nd boarding for flight 93, this was one of those things they couldn’t forsee. After closing it’s door at the terminal, Flight 93 reopened the door to the plane, to allow Mark Bingham aboard. Mark Bingham has for all intents and purposes totally messed up and missed his plane. They literally re-opened the door to the airplane at the terminal jet-bridge and allowed him onto the plane.

Quote:
Mark Bingham: Flight 93One passenger was late. Mark Bingham had overslept and his friend, Matthew Hall, drove madly from Manhattan to Newark. They screeched to a halt outside Terminal A at 7:40. Bingham leapt from the car, lugging the old, blue-and-gold canvas bag he’d used as a rugby player at the University of California at Berkeley a decade earlier. United attendants reopened the door to the boarding ramp and let him on the plane.

Lucky he was that Flight 93 was 41 minutes late or he might have missed his flight.

After pulling away from the gate, flight 93 goes around the corner to pick up another ‘charter’ for the days flight, a second group of people. This was never reported on. Nor were you ever intended to so much as get a glimpse of this 2nd boarding. It happened as the result of a planning snafu.

Quote:
Triton’s Clayton White on other side of recruiting“You might say Clayton White’s life has come full circle since February 1996.

White’s career didn’t end there, however. He eventually made the NFL’s New York Giants as a free agent and spent three seasons in the league, the last one in 2002 with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

But the most lasting memory of White’s time in New York had nothing to do with football. “We had played a Monday night game in Denver, and flew back home the next morning,” White said. “We landed in Newark, N.J., about 6:45 in the morning. We usually get off the plane on the tarmac and board a bus to get to our cars.

I noticed another plane sitting next to ours because the people were walking to the plane across the tarmac instead of through the jetway.

“Two weeks later, as we’re taking another plane to a game, one of the stewardesses informed us the plane that had been boarding next to us was Flight 93that crashed in Pennsylvania on 9/11. That was a very eerie feeling.” – Fayetteville Observer (01/31/06)

Triton Clayton White saw something he wasn’t supposed to see, because the planners of 911 did not take into consideration the possibility of charter flights offloading on the same tarmac they were to pick up this 2nd group of people with Flight 93. Triton Clayton White (New York Giant Football player) saw FLIGHT 93 being boarded on theTarmac at Newark, which is another separate boarding then when they picked people up at the terminal using a jet-bridge. That self same terminal at Newark, to this day, has a flag at it, where the hero’s of 9/11 boarded their fateful flight. Make no mistake about it, the first group of people boarded at the terminal, and a 2nd group of people boarded on the Tarmac. All onto flight 93, and all of this at Newark on 9/11.

But who is this 2nd group of people being boarded onto flight 93, and why the cloak and dagger boarding of a 2nd group of passengers onto Flight 93 on the tarmac, AFTER the boarding at the terminal?

This presents us with our 4th conundrum. There appears to be incredibly serious issues with each of the flights, their boardings, their departures, identities, destinations, and now this?

STATUS: NO DEPARTURE: NO BOARDING: On flight 11, we have passengers which boarded and disappeared onto a plane which never took off and which video evidence plausibly shows to be a military drone.

STATUS: DEPARTURE & BOARDING: On flight 175, we have a different issue, as the plane which struck the towers was not commercial flight 175, with those passengers aboard, and also all sorts of plausible evidence that shows this plane to be a military drone as well.

STATUS: NO DEPARTURE: NO BOARDING: On flight 77, we have passengers which allegedly board and depart on a flight which never departed that day, according to BTS.

STATUS: DEPARTURE & TWO BOARDINGS: On flight 93, we have an unusual late passenger being let on the plane after missing it, as well as a second boarding on thetarmac after its first initial boarding at the terminal using a jet-bridge.

This is as far as my research has gone, sorry I cannot supply any answers or solutions beyond this, but feel free to chime in with your own research and ideas. Psyche. Just kidding. Actually, if your still with me, we are nearly done with wrapping up all the loose ends and tying it all together and seeing what happened on 911 as well as the most plausible explanation to all of the mysteries regarding the passengers and flights.

From here out, it is actually very simple. At Boston they did a variation of the disappearing coin trick, with an additional coin thrown in, Delta flight 1989, as we will see, and at Dulles, they used the disappearing deck trick. Simply put, the passengers of flight 77 at Dulles are the same group of people who we see on the SECOND BOARDING AT NEWARK AIRPORT. The passengers at Dulles caught an earlier flight which took them to Newark where they were to rendevouz with Flight 93, and did so successfully. Howbeit, there is a witness to this deception, Triton Clayton White, the New york Giant who saw Flight 93 boarding ON THE TARMAC. After its FIRST BOARDING AT THE TERMINAL.

At Boston Logan International Airport, they used a similar deception. Here, the passengers from both flights 11 & 175 are combined into one flight. It would eventually become delta flight 1989 and land at Cleveland International Airport… While flight 93, now having also the passengers from flight 77 from the 2nd boarding at Newark, will head to the same destination; Cleveland International Airport.

Stuart Air Force Base Mystery – Explained

Above Stuart air force base we are told that flight 11 and 175 nearly collided they got so close. We were also given snippets of this through air traffic control tapes. The explanation for this is as plausible as it is logical. This is where the 2 military drones which were to strike to world trade centers took off from. They would replace the flight path of Flight 175 as well as the path of flight 11, which up to this point was provided for by an electronic warfare plane which was one of “4″ such aircraft in the air for the War games which were taking place on 9/11/2001. Sometime shortly after this, Flight 175 NOW HAVING BEEN REPLACED BY A MILITARY DRONE ON RADAR will change its transponder to Delta 1989, and make an emergency landing at Cleveland, with reports of a bomb aboard. This plane would contain roughly 200 people, and not only is it plausible that these people were the people from flights 11 & 175, it is highly probable and likely. Another plane, Flight 93, would also land at Cleveland airport. This was confirmed by both the Mayor of Cleveland, and United Airlines who publicly acknowledged on 911 and confirmed flight 93 landed in Cleveland. Flight 93 would end up being sequestered at one end of the airport, at the NASA Glenn hangar, while the other flight containing the other passengers from 11 & 175, now designated as Delta 1989, would be sequestered at the other end of the airport, at the I-X Exposition center. The two flights, Delta 1989 and United flight 93 had roughly 260 some people between them, the same number as the “4″ flights, 11, 175, 77 & 93.

The Cleveland Airport Mystery – Explained

The following is from Woodybox, a diligent 911 researcher. In a nutshell he explains why it was 2 separate aircraft which landed at Cleveland. In my above article, the reason why is obvious.

Quote:
We can conclude that Delta 1989 landed at 10:10, and at 12:30 the 69 passengers were taken into the FAA headquarter. Flight X landed at 10:45, and at 11:15 the 200 passengers were taken into the evacuated NASA Center.

Cleveland Hopkins Airport - note that the blue runways were in planning yet on 9/11. The big black rectangle in the South is the I-X Center

5) The exact location of the plane

This is the final proof that we have to do with two different planes. Both planes were sitting on a runway, but miles away from each other. One plane was at the west end of runway 28/10 near the NASA center (point 10 in the map). This is confirmed by Associated Press and an eyewitness (5A). The other plane was sitting at the south end of runway 18/36 near the I-X-Center (point 36), also confirmed by two eyewitnesses (5B). The geographic conditions on the airport suggest that the passengers at the West end were taken to the NASA Center and the passengers at the South end to the FAA headquarter.

We summarise our findings:

………………………………………….. ……..Delta 1989……………….Flight X

Moment of landing…………………………..10:10…… …………………10:45

Begin of evacuation………………………….12:30…. …………………..11:15

Number of passengers……………………….69………. ………………….200

Passengers brought to…………. ……….FAA/Airport……………….NASA

Exact location……………………………Runway 18/36 …………Runway 28/10

………………………………………….. …near I-X Center……….near NASA Center

batcave 9-11
911review

Woodybox directory

The Cleveland Airport Mystery


click to enlarge

Update (06/21): WoodyBox found new witnesses, which point on two different “quarantined” planes at Cleveland Hopkins (see “comments”) WoodyBox (“Flight 11 – The Twin Flight”) new article is yet another groundbreaking analysis. It appears, that the majority of 9/11 Researchers and the 9/11 family members, who lost their loved ones, have to compile a new list of questions about an airport, which didn’t receive much attention yet: Cleveland Hopkins, Ohio.

Among the disturbing new details are two flights, which apparently had been part of yet another “mirror flight” scenario. “Both” got grounded in Ohio. One of them was Delta1989, the other one was identified as, most shocking: “Flight 93″! But there are also many new questions about some “200 passengers” of that day…

The Cleveland Airport Mystery

200+ passengers got lost on 9/11 - by mailto:woody_box2000@yahoo.de Woody Box

Exclusive for INN Report -May 30

In midst the chaos breaking out in the hours after the WTC and Pentagon attacks, between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m an airplane made an emergency landing at Cleveland Hopkins Airport . Rumors were going around that it was hijacked or had a bomb on board. The FBI evacuated the plane and searched it with bomb-sniffing dogs after the passengers had left. It turned out to be false alarm. The plane – Delta flight1989 – was not hijacked, and there was no bomb.

However, a closer examination reveals a bunch of conflicting statements concerning Delta 1989. Neither the moment of landing, nor the number of the passengers, nor the location of the grounded plane is clear. For every aspect of the incident there are two different versions. Not one or three or four versions, but two.

This article will prove that not one, but two planes made an emergency landing in Cleveland – in close succession. The proof is based on local newspaper and radio reports from September 11th and 12th (mainly from the Akron Beacon Journal and the Cleveland Plain Dealer), statements of eyewitnesses and internet postings in the morning of 9/11 (people were listening to the radio and immediately submitted the breaking news to the net). One of the flights was indeed Delta 1989. We don’t know the identity of the other one, so we call it “Flight X”…

We start with a short summary of the events in Cleveland. At 10 a.m., the airport was evacuated. Without doubt, this had to do with the rumours that a hijacked plane was going to land. The passengers had to leave the airport but were not allowed to take their car. They had to walk or got a ride at the highway. Busses were not allowed to leave the airport. People around the airport were told to go home. It was a very tense situation. These facts are undisputed.

Cleveland Mayor Michael White held a televised news conference at 11 a.m., after the emergency landing. According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, he said there was an unconfirmed report that the plane might have been hijacked or was carrying a bomb. But in the middle of the news conference, he reported that it had not been hijacked, and later in the day he said no bomb had been found. This was not the only detail that changed in the course of the day. In the morning, White said that air controllers could hear screaming on the plane. In the afternoon, he didn’t mention the screams anymore.

We will now examine several parameters of the emergency landing:

1) The moment of landing

2) The begin of the evacuation of the passengers

3) The number of passengers

4) The place the passengers were interviewed after the evacuation

5) The exact location of the grounded plane

We will see that there are two different data for every parameter, suggesting that we are dealing with two different planes. We will omit the “a.m.” because it’s clear that everything is happening in the morning.

1) The moment of landing

AP and two Ohio newspapers report a landing at 10:45 (1A). However, Delta Airlines has registered 10:10 as the landing time and Cleveland firefighters can confirm that the landing took place before 10:30 (1B). Because Delta Airlines did not loose the track of its plane, the 10:10 plane was surely Delta 1989. So the 10:45 plane is – by definition – Flight X.

2) The begin of the evacuation of the passengers

The Akron Beacon Journal writes in an extra edition from 9/11 that the passengers were released from the plane at 11:15. This is confirmed by internet postings describing the events in real-time (2A). However, a passenger from Delta 1989 relates that she had to stay more than two hours in the plane before the FBI started to search it and took the passengers away for questioning. The Plain Dealer has learned about a evacuation time of 12:30, confirming the witness’ statement. (2B).

Thanks to the most valuable statement of the passenger, we can conclude that Delta 1989 landed at 10:10 and was evacuated at 12:30. Flight X landed at 10:45 and was evacuated at 11:15.

3) The number of passengers

The first press reports tell us that the plane carried 200 passengers. Mayor White mentioned this number on his 11 o’clock conference (3A). He did not say how he got the number. The passenger of Delta 1989 however, she must know it, made an estimation of “sixty or so” passengers. This is confirmed by later reports – the story changed quickly. Now, 69 passengers have been released from the plane, going well with the “sixty or so” (3B).

We can conclude that Delta 1989 landed at 10:10, the 69 passengers being evacuated at 12:30. Flight X landed at 10:45, the 200 passengers being released at 11:15.

4) The place the passengers were interviewed after the evacuation

The most reports say that the passengers were brought into a nearby NASA facility (4A). This is the NASA Glenn Research Center, located near the west end of the airport. It was already evacuated. The passenger of delta 1989 however tells us that she was taken into a “secure building at the airport”. This is confirmed by a report that the Delta 1989 passengers were interviewed in the FAA headquarter (4B). Surely the FAA headquarter is not located in the NASA facility.

We can conclude that Delta 1989 landed at 10:10, and at 12:30 the 69 passengers were taken into the FAA headquarter. Flight X landed at 10:45, and at 11:15 the 200 passengers were taken into the evacuated NASA Center.

Cleveland Hopkins Airport - note that the blue runways were in planning yet on 9/11. The big black rectangle in the South is the I-X Center

5) The exact location of the plane

This is the final proof that we have to do with two different planes. Both planes were sitting on a runway, but miles away from each other. One plane was at the west end of runway 28/10 near the NASA center (point 10 in the map). This is confirmed by Associated Press and an eyewitness (5A). The other plane was sitting at the south end of runway 18/36 near the I-X-Center (point 36), also confirmed by two eyewitnesses (5B). The geographic conditions on the airport suggest that the passengers at the West end were taken to the NASA Center and the passengers at the South end to the FAA headquarter.

We summarise our findings:

………………………………………….. ……..Delta 1989……………….Flight X

Moment of landing…………………………..10:10…… …………………10:45

Begin of evacuation………………………….12:30…. …………………..11:15

Number of passengers……………………….69………. ………………….200

Passengers brought to…………. ……….FAA/Airport……………….NASA

Exact location……………………………Runway 18/36 …………Runway 28/10

………………………………………….. …near I-X Center……….near NASA Center

The 69 passengers of Delta 1989 are (hopefully) alive and well. Questions remain:

Where did Flight X come from, who were the 200 passengers, and what happened to them?

Sources

(1A) Landing at 10:45

The airplane landed at about 10:45 a.m., but the airport released no information about the plane’s intended destination. Associated Press 9/11/01

The flight to Los Angeles landed at Hopkins at 10:45 a.m., and was directed to a secure area of the airport. Akron Beacon Journal 9/12/01

Delta Flight 1989 made an emergency landing at Hopkins about 10:45 a.m., nearly two hours after the World Trade Center towers were hit by two hijacked planes. Cleveland Plain Dealer 9/12/01

(1B) Landing at 10:10

10:30 a.m. Flight quarantined. On a remote taxiway at Hopkins International Airport in Cleveland, Delta Flight 1989 is quarantined. Since early reports that a bomb, then hijackers, might be aboard, Delta CEO Leo Mullin, 58, had nervously tracked the flight from the company’s headquarters in Atlanta. Every five minutes, a new report came in. None seemed clear. Still, the flight landed uneventfully in Cleveland at 10:10 a.m. USA Today, 8/12/02

After treatment and transport to the hospital, reports over our radio confirmed the south tower had collapsed. … My chief put out an order to return to quarters. He received reports there was a plane sequestered on the runway of Cleveland Hopkins Airport, because of a possible hijacking or a bomb on board. Responding back to our firehouse my heart started pounding faster as we became closer to our station, which is only a few hundred yards from the south side of the airport. The second tower now had collapsed. There it was a huge plane standing eerily still. Police, EMS and fire are positioned in the distance. Scott Boulton, Cleveland firefighter. The reports of the suspicious plane on the runway obviously came in BEFORE the WTC North Tower collapsed (10:28 ). A 10:10 landing time fits very well into Boulton’s chronology (set between the first and second WTC collapse), while a 10:45 landing time contradicts it.

(2A) Evacuation at 11:15

The 200 passengers were reportedly released from the plane at 11:15 a.m., though White said the pilot was still concerned that a bomb remained. Akron Beacon Journal 9/11/01

A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White. White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated. WCPO-TV, Cincinnati, 9/11/01, 11:43:57. So at 11.43, the evacuation was already finished.

“We have lost track of a number of planes,” quote from FAA. From Scott P at PTE – Just heard an unconfirmed report that a plane on the ground at Cleveland-Hopkins Airport has a bomb on board with approximately 200 people on board. PT Cruiser Club Forum Posted by Cruisin in Calgary at Sept?11,?2001,?8:14?AM PST (=11:14 EST)

The plane at Hopkins has been deplaned and they are going to search it for a bomb now. PT Cruiser CLub Forum Posted by Terry J at Sep?11,?2001,?8:41?AM PST (=11:41 EST) . So there were no passengers on the plane anymore at 11:41.

(2B) Evacuation at 12:30

After our emergency landing, our plane was directed to go to an isolated area of the airport, and we waited for over two hours in quarantine before FBI agents and bomb sniffing dogs came out to the plane. Delta 1989 passenger’s story

About 12:30 p.m. baggage cars and shuttle buses approached the plane. The 69 passengers and nine crew members then walked down a portable staircase and onto the buses, which took them to FAA headquarters nearby. Cleveland Plain Dealer 9/12/01

(3A) 200 passengers

The 200 passengers were reportedly released from the plane at 11:15 a.m., though White said the pilot was still concerned that a bomb remained. Akron Beacon Journal 9/11/01

The plane was sitting on a runway at the airport’s west end with approximately 200 passengers on board. Associated Press, 9/11/01

About 200 passengers were aboard the plane. It will be checked for a bomb. News Channel 5, Cleveland-Akron,9/11/01

A few hours after Mayor White’s first news conference, FBI Special Agent Mark Bullock confirmed that the Delta jet with 200 people aboard had landed safely and had not been in danger. WCPN radio, 9/12/01

The mayor of Cleveland has announced that an airplane containing 200 passengers has been sequestered at the Cleveland Hopkins Airport. They believe there may be a bomb on the plane. Metafilter.com forum posted by turaho at 8:37 a.m. PST (=11:37 EST)

(3B) 69 passengers

The sixty or so passengers were thus able to gather some alarming details of the unbelievable fates of the other two LA-bound planes. Delta 1989 passenger’s story
The 69 passengers and nine crew members then walked down a portable staircase and ontothe buses, which took them to FAA headquarters nearby. Cleveland Plain Dealer 9/12/01

The plane was evacuated of its 78 passengers shortly before 1 p.m. Akron Beacon Journal 9/12/01( 78 = 69 passengers + 9 crew members)

(4A) Interview in NASA Center

They (the passengers) were taken to NASA Glenn Research Center to be interviewed by FBI agents. The center had been evacuated about an hour before.) Akron Beacon Journal 9/12/01

The Boeing 767 was evacuated and searched, said Della Homenik, spokeswoman for Mayor Michael R. White. Passengers were taken to a nearby NASA facility. The Post, Athens, Ohio, 9/11/01

I thought the target could also have be NASA’s Glen/Lewis Research Center that is right next to the Cleveland Airport.The news reported that the plane landed because of a suspected bomb on board but they haven’t released anyone that was on that plane. The closed NASA and transported everyone that was on the plane there for questioning. E-Mail Repository, posted by “Connie”, time unknown.

(4B) Interview in FAA/Airport building

While our personal effects were examined we were taken to a secure building at the airport where for three hours we were interrogated at length. Delta 1989 passenger’s story

The 69 passengers and nine crew members then walked down a portable staircase and onto the buses, which took them to FAA headquarters nearby. Cleveland Plain Dealer 9/12/01

(5A) Plane at West end near NASA Center

The plane was sitting on a runway at the airport’s west end with approximately 200 passengers on board. Associated Press, 9/11/01

At the same time that we passed the Cleveland airport, the radio was reporting that a plane had been quarantined at the airport and forced to stay away from the terminal. There was some concern that a bomb might be aboard. As we went by, we say the plane with a number of vehicles surrounding it. Lights were flashing. We wondered if there were hijackers aboard that very plane. Rudy K, personal report. Rudy K was on the way home from Toledo to Rochester, N.Y., taking Interstate 480. This highway runs parallel to runway 28/10, a few hundred yards more to the North. The I-X-Center is three miles away – too far away for Rudy K’s eyes to recognize vehicles. He was watching a plane near the northern boundary of the airport. His report confirms the existence of a plane near the NASA Center. Thanks to his precise description, we can also conclude that he passed the airport at about 11 o’clock as he began his ride at 9:30 in Toledo and arrived at 4 p.m. in Rochester (with a little stop). Flight X was already there at 11 o’clock.

(5B) Plane at South end near I-X Center

Kurt Voelkel, 18, of Parma watched as the Delta sat on a remote area of the Hopkins tarmac near the I-X Center. Akron Beacon Journal 9/12/01

He received reports there was a plane sequestered on the runway of Cleveland Hopkins Airport, because of a possible hijacking or a bomb on board. Responding back to our firehouse my heart started pounding faster as we became closer to our station, which is only a few hundred yards from the south side of the airport. The second tower now had collapsed. There it was a huge plane standing eerily still. Police, EMS and fire are positioned in the distance. Scott Boulton, Cleveland firefighter. Boulton works with the fire department of Brookmark, a small city south-east of Hopkins Airport. His station is on Holland Street, just opposite the end of runway 18/36 (“only a few hundred yards from the southside of the airport”). So he is talking of the plane near the I-X Center, too.

 Click to enlarge

Footnotes

The 10 factual data presented in the text are each supported by at least two independent sources. Everybody who denies the occurring of two emergency landings should be able to provide us with clear answers to these five questions: When did the plane land, when was it evacuated, how many passengers dit it carry, where were they interviewed, where was the plan sitting at the airport. For every answer, he should also be able to disprove the contradicting two (or more) sources. I think this is very hard work. Good luck.

There are many rumours and uncorroborated messages around the events in Cleveland. I want to present them here, but I endorse careful handling as they are not independently verified.

Flight X = United Airlines Flight?

White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated. United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.WCPO-TV, Cincinnati, 9/11/01, 11:43:57 (Mirror)

This message, submitted at 11:43 in the morning, is nowhere else to find. It’s the only hint that Flight X might be United Airlines 93, but you have to wonder about the differing passenger numbers (UA 93: 33 passengers; Flight X: 200 passengers). Very obscure the last sentence: If United Airlines told the reporters the number of the passengers, why don’t they submit this news to the public? Did the airline tell them the number but on the condition not to publish it?

[11:01] (temas) there was an emergency landing safely completed in Cleveland

[11:02] (temas) potential bomb on the plane

[11:02] (temas) and it might be the missing UA flight

This jabber obviously followed the radio or TV news. He refers to what he’s hearing, so it’s not his own, but the radio’s guessing that the plane in Cleveland might be the “missing UA flight”. Very likely temas is talking about Flight X because Delta 1989′s identity never was in question. Note that the time of the posting 11:01 points to a landing of 10:45, too.

The Toledo Plane

White reported that another plane was diverted from Hopkins toward Toledo. Akron Beacon Journal 9/11/01

He said airport officials reported that a second airplane in distress had passed through Cleveland airspace earlier Tuesday morning before being handed off to Toledo. Officials at Toledo Express Airport did not immediately have any information about a plane headed from Cleveland. Associated Press, 9/11/01

So we have another obscure plane in an emergency situation, and in the light of the new evidence, we might ask if the Toledo Plane is identical to Flight X. It seems that Mayor White was not the best informed person in Cleveland since he changed his statements a couple of times during the day.

Virginia Buckingham’s statement

A disturbing first-hand statement comes from Virginia Buckingham. She was not only security chief of Boston Airport on 9/11, but also CEO of MA Port Authority.

By 9:30, the FAA had grounded all flights out of Boston and New York. By 9:40, all US flight operations were halted. As we tried to account for all Boston-originating flights already in the air, we received word that a Delta flight out of Logan, bound for the West Coast, had lost radio contact with air traffic control.

When exactly did Delta 1989 loose radio contact? At 9:36, Cleveland Center warned the plane to stay away from UA 93, and this USA Today report confirms that the pilot asked the controllers to land in Cleveland shortly before 9:45 when the FAA released an order to ground all planes. So until about 9:40-9:45 Delta 1989 was in contact with Air Traffic Control.

Victoria Buckingham: I felt sick to my stomach. It would be more than an hour before we received word that the flight had landed safely in Cleveland.

So it took more than an hour after the lost radio contact that Mrs. Buckingham learned of the safe landing of the flight. This must have happened at about 10:45-11:00 and perfectly fits the landing time of Flight X. Did she refer to Flight X? Delta 1989 landed at 10:10 in Cleveland, and it is unbelievable that the pilot allowed the passengers to make phone calls but didn’t inform his airline about the safe landing. If Mrs. Buckingham was talking about Delta 1989, why did she had to wait more than half an hour to get the reassuring message that the plane and the passengers were okay?

Col. Alan Scott’s statement

Col. Scott testified to the 9-11 commission on 5/23/03:

MR. SCOTT: 9:27, Boston FAA reports a fifth aircraft missing, Delta Flight 89 — and many people have never heard of Delta Flight 89. We call that the first red herring of the day, because there were a number of reported possible hijackings that unfolded over the hours immediately following the actual attacks. Delta 89 was not hijacked, enters the system, increases the fog and friction if you will, as we begin to look for that. But he lands about seven of eight minutes later and clears out of the system.
At 9:49, FAA reports that Delta 89, which had been reported as missing, is now reported as a possible hijacking. So again he is –

MR.: That’s 9:41, sir.

MR. SCOTT: I’m sorry, 9:41. Again, he is in the system. He is kind of a red herring for us.

Plane Swap Over Pennsylvania Flight 93 Woodybox

World Premiere -WoodyBox: How to steal an airliner and fake a hijacking
Air Traffic Control Center Ronkonkoma- Red Herring or Cover-up?
The lost “terror drills ? Pt.11a This final chapter includes the real reason of “wargames”
as a planted distraction to “anti terror drills”, two government “agents” on Delta1989 and Colgan5930?,
Amalgam Virgo “1.5″, Rosetta Stone, the significance of 1951, Tinker AFB, White Sands, STARS,

The lost “terror drill”? Pt.11b
9/11 was a combination of older terror drills, NOT wargames! Major parts had been also tested during Amalgam Virgo 01 (June 2001) and during three until recently lesser-known drills in Westmoreland County, Buffalo and Dayton. These three drills had odd similarities with the fate of Flight 77, Flight 11, Flight 175 and Flight 93.

Michael Kane: “9/11 War Games – No Coincidence”

September 11 video and photo analysis
9/11 batcave Homepage

9-11 review Wiki

911review

Not only does this explain the mystery of what happened to the passengers from the 4 planes, it also gives a plausible explanation for just about every other mystery regarding the 4 flights that day. The passengers from all 4 flights, 11, 175, 77 and 93 all ended up at Cleveland Airport, and not coincidently, in the same planes were were told made emergency landings because of reports of a “bomb” aboard. Delta 1989 & Flight 93. e.g. Delta 1989 was the bomb aboard “story” and also gave plausible and good reasons why Cleveland International airport could be closed & evacuated, so that total & complete control could be taken for these ‘special passengers’ from Delta 1989 & flight 93.

Quote:
United Air Flight 93 air traffic recording with “flight 93 & a bomb abaord”This shows the air traffic control tape between “flight 93 with a bomb aboard talking to Cleveland:”

YouTube- United Air Flight 93 air traffic recordinghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HoGrkNNgB4

 

The Mayor of Cleveland later confirmed that this plane, “Flight 93″ landed safely at Cleveland International Airport.

This plausibly explains the following;

  • Hijacker mystery
  • Why the Cell phone calls needed to be made & were faked
  • Lack of Video of Passengers at 4 airports on 911
  • Why the 2 American Airlines flights, 11 & 77 show in the BTS database as not having flown
  • Stuart Air Force base mystery
  • Why there is video and photographic evidence showing both 11 & 175 to be military drones
  • Cleveland International Airport Mystery
  • Mystery of the missing people from 4 planes on 911

And it also gives an incredibly plausible explanation for the sequence of events regarding the passengers of the 4 planes and the mysteries surrounding them. All of the passengers, from 4 groups, and 3 locations, ended up in 1 central location, Cleveland International Airport. They had seamlessly & successfully disappeared.

What happened after Cleveland is anyone’s guess. All air traffic was closed. If any planes flew, it is doubtful there was recordings of them, especially if they contained the passengers from any of these 4 flights. All that lied ahead of them at this point is their new lives and new identities. And as pointed out earlier, it is possible some real passengers were added to the planes, but this is beyond the scope of my research and beyond the scope of this article.

There is what I believe happened to the passengers. For the first time in 9 years I believe we have come as close as we can without a full fledged honest open inquiry into the crimes of 911 in understanding all the mysteries of the missing passengers & planes. Perhaps you believe the passengers were all real, and then eliminated afterward. Regardless of your viewpoint on this issue, I believe I have outlined the most plausible explanation as to what occurred on 9/11 regarding the 4 planes and passengers. Adapt this scenario as neccessary as it meets your knowledge of the events of 911.

I hope this helps many come to a better understanding of that days crimes and how they performed those crimes.

Cheers-
Phil Jayhan 
Site Admin

Radio Shows – Jim Fetzer. Deanna Spingola, Debbie Lewis:

*** IMPORTANT: Please use this link below for visual aids while listening to the interviews;

The 9/11 FraudulentTruth Movement: A Conspiracy 30+ Years in the Making
Fraudulent Hero’s of 9/11
9/11 World Trade Center Props
World Trade Center Publicity Stunts:
Exif/IPTC Metadata:
Video: Fraudulence on 9/11
Death Certificate #0001:
Social Security Death Payments & Other SSDI Related Evidence
The Hollow Towers & Pre-Demolition of WTC:
The World Trade Center Lighting & Picture History:
The Elevators at WTC on 9/11 and the Trapped People:
Revisiting the World Trade Center Phone Calls:
Fireman Actors on 9/11:
New York City Fire Department 9/11 Fraudulent Victims
Stand In Actors on 9/11:
Flight 11 Frauds:
Flight 175 Frauds:
Flight 77 Frauds:
Flight 93 Frauds:
The 911 Jumper Frauds:
North Tower Frauds:
Pentagon Stage Props – Pentagon TV Fakery:
Pentagon Fraudulent Victims on 9/11:
Media Complicity and Fraud:
Media 9/11 Memorial Frauds:
The 9/11 Memorial Wall:
9/11 & WTC Corporate Fraud:

Gatekeepers of the Alternate Media:

Pending Research Requests from Lets Roll Members:
MISC: Great Research Links on this Material above:
Former Stickies for the Hussled Masses:
9/11 Related Murders:

Directory of Organized Crime Links & 9/11 Ties

Osama Bin Laden Forum directory:
  1. May 26, 2013 at 13:36 | #1

    Highly energetic article, I liked that bit. Will there
    be a part 2?

  2. June 4, 2013 at 14:31 | #2

    In fact no matter if someone doesn’t know then its up to other users that they will assist, so here it occurs.

  3. June 4, 2013 at 22:13 | #3

    Hi to every body, it’s my first go to see of this web site; this blog consists of remarkable and truly good stuff for readers.

  4. June 6, 2013 at 06:30 | #4

    Ahaa, its pleasant discussion about this post here at this weblog,
    I have read all that, so now me also commenting here.

  5. June 11, 2013 at 08:13 | #5

    Hi my family member! I wish to say that
    this article is awesome, great written and include almost all important infos.
    I’d like to look extra posts like this .

  6. June 29, 2013 at 12:45 | #6

    The players would begin as members of the SCA, going to
    Phoenix for the Estrella War. The game was released on August 3, and is in stores now, but probably is
    where it will remain, sad to say. Cranberry studios developed this sequel while publisher Anaconda brings
    it to you in stores.

  7. July 6, 2013 at 01:02 | #7

    Hi there everybody, here every one is sharing these kinds of experience,
    so it’s fastidious to read this webpage, and I used to pay a quick visit this webpage everyday.

  8. July 7, 2013 at 21:45 | #8

    What’s Taking place i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It absolutely useful and it has helped me out loads. I am hoping to contribute & assist different users like its helped me. Good job.

  9. July 19, 2013 at 08:11 | #9

    Mum’s friends and I have witnessed patients with lifethreatening anemias from severe hookworms, and patients who ended up in ICU where she had to have surgery for a herniated disc, infection, inflammation, or mucous plugs. Explain your reasoning Develop Arguments and ClaimsOne very common mistake that I see involves poor development of claims and arguments, McCaddie explained. It is to be a painful and debilitating urinary tract infection treatment home condition is worse than when they started out.

  10. July 25, 2013 at 17:05 | #10

    I think the admin of this website is genuinely working hard for his web page,
    since here every information is quality based data.

  11. February 10, 2014 at 21:12 | #11

    I admire the time and energy you place into your
    website and detailed information you provide. It’s good to run into a blog every from time
    to time which isn’t exactly the same with several other materials.

    Superb article! I’ve saved your website and I’m including
    your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 82 other followers

%d bloggers like this: